Atraído por las historias alrededor del chatGPT, me di en la tarea de solicitarle que escribiera un cuento. Tome uno de los argumentos que yo utilice en mi historia: "Aragca tiene talento"
Un hombre vestido de payaso, va a un Reality de TV, presenta su acto que consiste en escribir un relato con una vieja máquina Remington. Luego de varias horas después del show, los jueces aparecen muertos. El payaso confiesa que los enveneno con una sustancia muy sofisticada. Y luego Desaparece hábilmente. Dos detectives deben resolver el caso. Conforme investigan se enteran de que los asesinatos son un complot de varias sociedades de villanos.
Intente dos veces, admito que hizo unos cuentos que son LIMPIOS y HONESTOS, pero no siento que tengan los mismos ingredientes que yo utilice, ya que ese relato fue la base de las historias que he venido escribiendo desde el 2020. Ese cuento es la columna vertebral de un escenario más grande.
Ejemplo 1:
Write a short story about a clown that goes to a TV reality show and performs with a typewriter, then the Judges like the act. 8 hours after all 3 judges were poisoned. Two detectives must solve the crime.
Benny the clown had always dreamed of making it big in show business. So when he saw an ad for a TV reality show looking for unique talents, he knew he had to audition. Benny's act was simple but impressive. He would sit at a small desk with a typewriter, and as he typed out words, he would act out each character with exaggerated facial expressions and movements. The judges were skeptical at first, but as Benny continued, they were won over by his charm and creativity. After the show, Benny went home feeling proud of himself. But just eight hours later, he received a call from the TV studio. All three judges had been poisoned, and the police were investigating. Benny was shocked and devastated. He had no idea who would want to harm the judges, and he certainly had no motive. But when the detectives arrived to question him, he knew he had to cooperate fully. As the investigation progressed, Benny learned that the judges had been poisoned with a rare toxin found only in a few exotic plants. He also discovered that one of the judges, a well-known critic, had given a negative review to a restaurant that served those plants. It was then that Benny realized that the killer must have been someone associated with that restaurant. He remembered seeing a waiter who seemed to be watching him during the audition. With this information, the detectives were able to track down the culprit and bring them to justice. In the end, Benny was exonerated, and his act became even more famous as a result of the tragic events. But he never forgot the terrible price that was paid for his moment in the spotlight, and he made a vow to always be vigilant and aware of the dangers that could lurk behind the glitz and glamour of show business.
La diferencia está en que la máquina nos entrega un payaso, bonachón, cuando la idea es que el payaso en realidad sea intimidante. Nunca le hubiera puesto yo Benny o un nombre, ya que la idea es mantener oculto lo más posible al asesino. En mi idea es que el Payaso NUNCA es encontrado por los detectives o al menos alguien muy difícil de capturar.
Decidí darle mas información a ver si creaba algo que me sorprendiera.
Ejemplo 2:
Write a short story about an Aristocrat dressed as a clown that goes to a TV reality show and performs with a typewriter, then the Judges like the act. 8 hours after all 3 judges were poisoned. Two detectives must solve the crime. The clown was never found. A secret society of villains contracted the clown to do the killings
The Aristocrat had always been fascinated by the world of the commoners. As a member of one of the oldest and wealthiest families in the country, he had grown bored with the endless rounds of parties and social events that made up his life. So when he heard about a TV reality show looking for unique talents, he decided to audition - but not as himself. He donned a clown costume, complete with a red nose and oversized shoes, and went to the audition with a vintage typewriter in tow. As he began to type out words and act out each character with exaggerated movements, the judges were initially taken aback. But soon they were won over by the Aristocrat's undeniable talent and charisma. After the show, the Aristocrat slipped away, pleased with his performance but also relieved to shed the clown persona. However, just eight hours later, he learned that all three judges had been poisoned. Shocked and saddened, he vowed to cooperate fully with the police investigation. But as the investigation progressed, the Aristocrat began to realize that something was amiss. There seemed to be no motive for the killings, and no suspects had been found. He couldn't help but wonder if he himself had somehow played a role in the tragedy. It wasn't until several weeks later that the truth came to light. The Aristocrat was approached by a shadowy figure, who revealed himself to be a member of a secret society of villains. The society had contracted the clown persona to do the killings, with the Aristocrat as their unwitting pawn. Feeling betrayed and horrified, the Aristocrat fled the country, unable to face the consequences of his unwitting involvement in the crime. But even as he lived out his life in exile, he could never forget the terrible price that was paid for his moment of amusement on the reality show. And he vowed never to underestimate the dangers that could lurk beneath the surface of even the most innocent-seeming entertainment.
Aquí mejoro un poco: No le puso nombre al protagonista, que a veces si va con mi estilo, pero lo que no me gusto es que la historia está muy forzada, la máquina creo dos personajes diferentes, un payaso bueno y uno malo. Además deduce que el aristócrata estaba aburrido. Cuando la idea es que el aristócrata mata gente es porque es alguien de pura maldad.
No hay ni la menor pizca de humor en ninguno de los dos relatos. No hay ironía. No hay citas crípticas.
Diria yo, que escribo "por el momento" mejor que ChatGPT.